Open Policy Agent (OPA) for Policy Authorization
1st Jan 2025
Introduction
In the world of microservices and cloud-native applications, managing authorization policies can quickly become complex. Open Policy Agent (OPA) is a general-purpose policy engine that provides a unified way to define and enforce fine-grained policies across your entire stack. This blog will walk you through using OPA for policy-based authorization, integrating it with your backend, and defining policies using the Rego language.
OPA decouples policy decision-making from application logic, enabling flexibility and centralization of policy enforcement. Let’s dive into how OPA can be used for role-based access control (RBAC) in a microservice architecture.
What is OPA?
OPA is an open-source, declarative policy engine that allows you to define policies in a high-level, declarative language called Rego. These policies are evaluated against incoming requests, and based on the outcome, OPA will return an "allow" or "deny" decision. This decouples the policy logic from the application, making your codebase cleaner and more manageable.
OPA is well-suited for enforcing policies in different layers of your system, including API authorization, Kubernetes admission control, and more.
Setting Up OPA for Policy Authorization
For this tutorial, we’ll build a basic OPA policy service that integrates with a backend application. OPA will determine whether a user is authorized to access certain resources based on roles stored in a database.
Step 1: Install OPATo get started, you can install OPA using Docker, which is the easiest method. Run the following command:
docker run -p 8181:8181 openpolicyagent/opa run --server
This command starts OPA on port 8181 in server mode, allowing us to interact with it using HTTP.
Step 2: Define an Example Policy
We’ll define a simple RBAC policy where only users with the role of
admin or user can access certain resources.
Policies are written in Rego and saved as .regofiles.
Here’s a basic Rego policy that checks the user’s role:
package authz
default allow = false
allow {
input.user.role == "admin"
}
allow {
input.user.role == "user"
}
This policy checks the input.user.role field to see if it
matches admin or user. If so, the
allow rule evaluates to true, and OPA will return an
"allow" decision.
You can test the policy using a curl command. Save the
Rego policy as authz.rego and run the following command
to load and evaluate it:
curl -X POST http://localhost:8181/v1/data/authz/allow -d '{
"input": {
"user": {
"role": "admin"
}
}
}'
OPA will respond with a true or
false decision based on the role provided in the input.
{
"result": true
}
OPA returns true because the user role is
admin, which is allowed according to the policy.
Comparison with other policy authorization frameworks
Here’s a comparison table that evaluates Open Policy Agent (OPA) against other popular policy authorization frameworks like AWS IAM, Google Cloud IAM, Kubernetes RBAC, and Spring Security.
| Feature/Aspect | Open Policy Agent (OPA) | AWS IAM | Google Cloud IAM | Kubernetes RBAC | Spring Security | Keycloak | Custom Authorization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy Language | Rego (declarative, flexible, highly granular) | JSON (policy documents) | YAML/JSON (policy documents) | YAML (Role & RoleBinding definitions) | Java/Annotations (method-level, config-based) | JSON, XML (using policies and roles) | Any (flexible, defined by custom implementation) |
| Policy Granularity | Highly granular, supports RBAC, ABAC, and custom | Fine-grained but limited to AWS resources | Fine-grained for Google resources | Role-based, focused on Kubernetes resources | Fine-grained, flexible for app resources | Fine-grained, supports RBAC, ABAC, custom policies | Fully flexible, defined by your design |
| Policy Location | Policies stored externally (files, APIs, DB) | Integrated within AWS resources | Integrated within Google Cloud resources | Integrated within Kubernetes cluster | Integrated within Spring Boot app | Stored within Keycloak, centrally managed | Fully flexible, defined by your system |
| Decoupled from Application | Yes, completely decoupled from application logic | Part of AWS resource configuration | Part of Google Cloud resource configuration | Part of Kubernetes cluster | Partially decoupled (through annotations or configuration) | Yes, can be decoupled or integrated with apps | Fully flexible, defined by your system |
| Support for Multiple Systems | Yes, supports any system via APIs or integrations | No, tied to AWS ecosystem | No, tied to Google Cloud ecosystem | No, tied to Kubernetes | No, tied to Spring Boot applications | Yes, supports multiple applications and protocols | Yes, fully customizable for any systems |
| Dynamic Policy Updates | Yes, can pull policies dynamically via APIs or DB | Policies are tied to AWS resources, updated via console or CLI | Policies updated via console or CLI | Yes, but limited to cluster scope | Yes, but manual update of configurations | Yes, policies can be updated dynamically | Depends on implementation (can be manual or automated) |
| Policy Evaluation Point | Can be deployed anywhere (sidecar, middleware, etc.) | Managed by AWS at the service level | Managed by Google at the service level | Evaluated within Kubernetes API | Evaluated within the application | Managed by Keycloak centrally | Fully flexible, can be evaluated in code, middleware, or an external service |
| Centralized Policy Management | Yes, centralized for multiple services or microservices | Centralized only for AWS services | Centralized only for Google services | Centralized only for Kubernetes resources | Centralized within Spring applications | Yes, centralized management for multiple apps | Depends on implementation (can be centralized or distributed) |
| Policy Decision Model | External decision-making engine (pull model) | Inline policy enforcement at AWS service level | Inline policy enforcement at Google service level | Inline policy enforcement at the Kubernetes API level | Inline policy enforcement (within app) | External decision-making, evaluated within Keycloak | Fully flexible (defined by implementation) |
| Extensibility | Highly extensible, supports custom rules, complex logic | Limited to AWS resources | Limited to Google Cloud resources | Focused on Kubernetes API resources | Extensible with custom logic in code | Extensible, supports custom rules, roles, and policies | Fully extensible, defined by your system |
| Support for Non-Cloud Systems | Yes, supports cloud and non-cloud environments | No, tied to AWS | No, tied to Google Cloud | No, tied to Kubernetes | Yes, applicable to any Spring-based system | Yes, supports both cloud and on-prem systems | Yes, fully flexible |
| Performance Overhead | Minimal when deployed locally or as a sidecar | Minimal but depends on AWS network latency | Minimal, depends on Google network latency | Minimal within the Kubernetes cluster | Minimal, evaluated within the application | Minimal, depends on external Keycloak latency | Depends on implementation (could be minimal to significant) |
| Community and Ecosystem | Strong open-source community, growing ecosystem | Large AWS-specific ecosystem | Large Google-specific ecosystem | Kubernetes-focused ecosystem | Large Spring Java ecosystem | Large open-source and enterprise ecosystem | Depends on the technology stack you choose |
| Compliance Support | Supports fine-grained compliance checks | Built-in AWS compliance features | Built-in Google Cloud compliance features | Built-in Kubernetes compliance | Requires manual implementation of compliance policies | Built-in compliance and identity features | Depends on implementation (requires manual compliance checks) |
Conclusion
OPA makes policy-based authorization easy to implement and scale in modern microservices architectures. By separating the policy logic from application code, you gain flexibility and maintainability. Whether you're enforcing RBAC, ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control), or custom policies, OPA provides a powerful and flexible solution.
With OPA integrated into your stack, you can manage policies in one place, scale them easily, and keep your application logic simple and clean.